Your main problem here is a lack of data. A "Breusch-Pagan test is
nonsignificant (Chi-square(4) = 1.77291, p= 0.777434)" does not reject the
null of heteroskedasticity. With your short series, however, the test
has very low power. Check what you are doing here.
Without some knowledge of the economic model that you are trying to
estimate and your data, it is not possible to advise you. Perhaps you
should check your application of the Breusch Pagan test to your pooled
regression if that is what you have done.
John C Frain
3 Aranleigh Park
Rathfarnham
Dublin 14
Ireland
www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.html
https://jcfrain.wordpress.com/
https://jcfraincv19.wordpress.com/
mailto:frainj@tcd.ie
mailto:frainj@gmail.com
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 13:39, 3J LEMA <3jlema(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For my panel data (all continuous variables; 1 DV, 4 IVs; 8 time
points
for each of the 5 companies), the Breusch-Pagan test is nonsignificant
(Chi-square(4) = 1.77291, p= 0.777434) implying that both Random effects
model and fixed effect model are not appropriate. I used the OLS
regression with heteroscedasticy problem. Any suggestions on how to remedy
this?
Appreciate your help.
Lema.
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list -- gretl-users(a)gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-users-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-users.gretlml.univpm.it/