Yes, EG has a different distribution than ADF. gretl is right.
cheers,
Sven
Ok, but....
All ADF tests on individual variables are right ie. thay are the same when
calculating from EG ADF tests and ADF tests from the main gretl window,
except for the residuals. Only ADF tests for the residuals are different.
You mean that there is a difference in distribution only for the residuals?
(coefficients are the same in EG and OLS)
>> From Engle-Granger cointegration:
> Step 6: Dickey-Fuller test on residuals
> Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests, order 12, for uhat
> sample size 86
> unit-root null hypothesis: a = 1
>
> test without constant
> estimated value of (a - 1): -0,333671
> test statistic: t = -2,46579
> asymptotic p-value 0,4903
>
>
>> From maing Gretl window:
> Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests, order 12, for uhat
> sample size 86
> unit-root null hypothesis: a = 1
>
> test without constant
> model: (1 - L)y = (a-1)*y(-1) + ... + e
> estimated value of (a - 1): -0,333671
> test statistic: t = -2,46579
> asymptotic p-value 0,01324
>
> Test statistics and estimated values, sample size are the same, but
> p-values are different?
>> From the first test ie. E-G one could conclude that there is no
> cointegration and from the second (from OLS saved residuals) that there
> is a cointegration relationship.
> Why is that?
> Did I make same mistaque in comparing?
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
_________________________________________________________________
Windows LiveĀ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb