On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote:
Ok,
can you please tell me why?
I see the same result without the time trend as regressor.
Sorry, I'm now lost. If you're getting the results you were
hoping for, that's fine.
Allin Cottrell
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Allin Cottrell
<cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote:
>
>> Importing data (set on 1,2,3 instead of 13/06/2011,
>> 14/06/2011 etc. on file Excel) importing them as cross
>> section instead of series and then not adding the time trend
>> I have the same result.
>
> You need to add the time trend and use it as a regressor.
> The Excel dates are OK but they are not a "variable", they're
> just an index of the observations.
>
> Allin Cottrell
> _______________________________________________
> Gretl-users mailing list
> Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>
--
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University, NC