[Gretl-users] Re: on near-zero std errors values

  Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 10:51, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti < p002264(a)staff.univpm.it&gt; a écrit : > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Artur Bala wrote: > > Hi, > > Probably the topic of "How small is really small?" has been already > > discussed but I'm still a bit confused. > > The fact > that many, in the economic profession, have come to the unfortunate habit > of automatically thinking "no stars -> bad, two stars -> good, three > stars > -> wow" should not deter us, as authors of a statistical package, from > reporting the statistic in the most precise way possible and refrain from > patronising the user. > Btw, in an OLS estimation (at the end of an iterative WLS process) I ended up with a somewhat extreme p-value though ‘non-zero’ printout :) F(4, 45) = 2.71006e+08 with p-value = 1.90538e-165 Best, Artur _______________________________________________ Gretl-users mailing list -- gretl-users(a)gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-users-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-users.gretlml.univpm.it/