On 9/25/2009 4:01 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
wouldn't it be easier to have a structure of
where projects/foo would contain foo.inp, foo.gdt and any other
Yes, that has some advantages.
It has two disadvantages:
- projects cannot easily share data
- there is still the conflict between the path for store and the
path for open,
with a corresponding chance of serious error
I'm thinking that a 3rd working directory option (set working directory to
script directory on `run`) might be helpful ... ?