Yes, that seems to be what Gretl is doing. Thanks. The next question is 
why? What is the advantage of scaling the frequency in this way?
Tom
Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
 
 I don't have this reference, but looking at the numbers I can guess that:
 
 if T is the period, and Nobs the number of observations, the scaled frequency 
 is 
 
 f=Nobs/T, 
 
 or said in another way, if w is the angular frequency, (w=2*pi/T)
 
 f=w*(Nobs/2*pi)