Thank you for the replies.
The gretl results otherwise all coincided with the R results.
Charles W
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
 On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Sven Schreiber wrote:
 > Am 30.11.2008 19:48, Allin Cottrell schrieb:
 > >> In gretl the results for d_LNEG lag2 were
 > >>                     coefficient   std. error   t-ratio   p-value
 > >> d_LNEG_2   -0.470623     0.126295     -3.726    0.2006
 > >> But in R the results were
 > >> z.diff.lag2      -0.47062      0.12629       -3.726    0.00053
 > >
 > > Thank you for spotting this.  The p-value given by gretl for the
 > > second lag of LNEG was incorrect: in fact it was the Dickey-Fuller
 > > p-value for the first lag of LNEG, printed in the wrong place.
 > >
 >
 > But for the case of ADF without constant IIRC the p-value for the
 > ADF-t=-3.7 would be much lower than 0.20, no?
 >From the output above, we don't know what the adf tau value was --
 all we have is the t-stat for d_LNEG_2.  That is, it was only the
 p-value that was misplaced in the printout, the other components
 on the d_LNEG_2 line actually belonged there (and agreed with R).
 Allin.
 _______________________________________________
 Gretl-users mailing list
 Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
 
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users