Re: [Gretl-users] issue with fctstats()
Am 15.04.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Artur T.:
I am not sure this behavior is intended, but to me it looks some
unintended behavior.
In the following example one of the scalars in the vector of realized
values y is zero which drives the division "(e./y)=-inf" and which
affects the later sum calculation as well. I guess gretl should ignore
this "-inf"-value, or do I miss anything here?
I've had the same problem in the past, but my conclusion was that it's
basically unavoidable given the definitions of some of the FC eval measures.
I cooked up my own alternative forecast measure function back then,
which I could share (after I've found it).
cheers,
sven