Re: [Gretl-users] Importing weekly data: bug?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 04.06.2018 um 18:13 schrieb Matteo Pelagatti:
>
> I guess that 664903 is the internal representation of the date, but I would
> have expected something like "2006-01-02".
>
Yes. Putting that number into the isodate() function yields 1821(-)06(-)11,
but I don't know if this means anything. (Why should that 19th century day be
a default pick?)
> Is this a bug, or I am missing something?
>
>
Very much looks like one.
Indeed. That should now be fixed in git and snapshots.
Allin