Greetings all
Have to say I'm getting confused, here.
I'd be appreciative please if somebody would tell me please
what this means "the reduced form".... of what?
Also if a set is stable as you say, and to produce its stationarity you are confident that
you haven't
squelched out important information from the data by differencing etc, what's the
reason to introduce trend information and then trust inferences from the results ?
Trend in their Unit Roots?
I'm cool
rest easy
Richard Hudson
Dr RJF Hudson Qld Australia
rjfhud(a)powerup.com.au
----- Original Message -----
From: Muheed Jamaldeen
To: Gretl list
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Deterministic trend in VAR
You're right about the VAR not being stable if USGDP were the only series in the
model. Well, the VAR is a 11 variable VAR (4). The 11 variables are GDP and macroeconomic
variables.
I am testing the impact of cash rate innovations on GDP. The question is, if the reduced
form is stable (and stationary) WITHOUT a trend, should one include a trend when the
univariate tests suggest that SOME of the series may have trend in their unit roots.
Hope that makes sense?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Summers, Peter <psummers(a)highpoint.edu> wrote:
MJ,
You're right that the unit root tests are telling you that you have a unit root in
at least one series.
I'm confused about what your VAR looks like though (and maybe the rest of the list
is too). If this is one of the series in your VAR, then it's not stable/stationary, by
definition. That is, the lag operator polynomial will have at least one root on the unit
circle. My earlier answer assumed that your unit root & cointegration tests ruled out
both, but now it seems that's not the case.
Relating to ths, how many series do you have in your VAR? My feeling is that 100 obs
per series isn't really a lot, especially if you're trying to sort out issues
related to deterministic vs stochastic trends, cointegration vs none, etc.
At this point I'd suggest a) reading the gretl manual and/or your favorite
reference on VARs & VECMs, and/or b) providing some more detail about what you're
trying to do.
PS
________________________________
From: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu [gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu] on behalf
of Muheed Jamaldeen [mj.myworld(a)gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 6:59 PM
To: Gretl list
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Deterministic trend in VAR
Peter,
I have 100 observations in the model. So small samples may or may not be an issue. I
am wondering if the deterministic trend is an issue at all because the VAR is stable
implying stationarity of the described process in each equation WITHOUT the trend (i.e.
the polynomial defined by the determinant of the autoregressive operator has no roots in
and on the complex unit circle without the time trend term).
The ADF tests suggest that we cannot reject the trend term. Let me show you an
example. Following is the ADF tests for logged US GDP.
Monte Carlo studies suggest that choosing the lag order (p) of the unit root tests
according to the formula: Int {12(T /100)1/ 4} so the lag order is 12 with 100
observations.
test without constant
test statistic: tau_nc(1) = 2.13551
asymptotic p-value 0.9927
test with constant
test statistic: tau_c(1) = -1.28148
asymptotic p-value 0.6405
with constant and trend
test statistic: tau_ct(1) = -0.728436
asymptotic p-value 0.9702
Following is the estimate for the trend term in the last ADF regression.
coefficient std. error t-ratio p-value
-------------------------------------------------------------
time 0.000200838 0.000317669 0.6322 0.5292
So all three tests are saying that I cannot reject the null of unit root. Including
I(1) variables in an unrestricted VAR is fine as Lutekepohl and Toda and Yammoto have
demonstrated. It's a question of whether a trend term is to be included. I am inclined
to think not because the VAR is stable WITHOUT a trend.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Mj
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Summers, Peter
<psummers@highpoint.edu<mailto:psummers@highpoint.edu>> wrote:
MJ,
If your data have deterministic trends, then unit root tests should pick that up
(though there may be a problem in small samples). If you include a trend but the dgp is
stationary, then a t-test should conclude that the trend coefficient is zero. Presumably
your unit root tests reject the null, right?
From:
gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu<mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu>
[mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu<mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu>]
On Behalf Of Muheed Jamaldeen
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 5:52 AM
To: Gretl list
Subject: [Gretl-users] Deterministic trend in VAR
Hi all,
Just a general VAR related question. When is it appropriate to include a deterministic
time trend in the reduced form VAR? Visually some of the data series (not all) look like
they have trending properties. In any case, does the inclusion of the time trend matter if
the process is stable and therefore stationary (i.e. the polynomial defined by the
determinant of the autoregressive operator has no roots in and on the complex unit circle)
without the time trend term. Other than unit root tests, is there a better way to test
whether the underlying data generating process has a stochastic or deterministic process?
I am mainly interested in the impulse responses.
Cheers,
Mj
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu<mailto:Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu>
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users