[Gretl-users] RE Probit --robust

Dear all, I tried to estimate a random effects probit model using the --robust option. After this, I re-estimated the model without it. I got the same results (i.e. standard errors) in both cases and looking at the output it became clear why, because Gretl said that estimation was "...based on inverse Hessian". However, I found this post from 2013, where Sven Schreiber already commented on this issue. http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-devel/2013-December/004835.html However, I did not find an answer to this post, which brings me to my question, is it possible use robust standard errors when one estimates a random effects probit model in Gretl. By "robust" I mean robust to some form of unspecified misspecification, like one checks the robust option, when using ols. Kind regards, Jan