On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:03 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Am 03.09.2024 um 17:54 schrieb Summers, Peter:
Ok, I’ve sorted it out. It’s not a bug after all, but there is a typo in the
documentation. Everything works if the restriction is (female = 0), but not with (female
== 0). The documentation specifies “==” in the “var2 op val” line & below.
I see what you mean and I actually do think it's a bug.
Yes. For backward compatibility we should probably continue to accept
"=" in that context, but we surely should not reject "==". I'll
see to
that shortly.
BTW, Peter, the snapshots can also be found at
https://users.wfu.edu/cottrell/gretl/ -- that site may work better for
you.
Allin