Thank u Allin!
Leon
Am 03.06.2013 um 23:36 schrieb Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Pindar wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> so, is it 'dz'?
I'll pick that one up in context, below.
> I've got another question to an example of the user-guide:
> <hansl>
> open abdata.gdt
> dpanel 2 ; n X ; GMM(w,2,3) GMM(k,2,3) Ivars --time --two-step --dpd
> # equal to
> dpanel 2 ; n X ; GMM(w,2,3) GMM(k,2,3) *GMM(w_1,2,2)* Ivars --time --two-step
> --dpd
> <hansl>
>
> Does gretl automatically add these instruments or is by construction of the
> estimation procedure already included?
It's by construction of the procedure.
> 25.05.2013 16:31, Pindar:
>>
>> I have a question concerning p.146 in the user-guide:
>>
>> Is this correct?
>>
>> "dz = diff(z)
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz ; GMM(*z*,0,0)"
[ quoted from the Guide ]
>>
>> Or should it be
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz ; GMM(*dz*,0,0)
>>
>> It the first one is right, then it's because the differences of the
>> instruments are computed after using them as instruments,
>> while in the latter specification they are not altered any more.
>>
>> I tried both variants in a few examples and found that the results of
>>
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz ; GMM(*dz*,0,0)
>>
>> are very similar, but not the same, while
>>
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz
>> dpanel 1 ; y dz ; GMM(*z*,0,0)
>>
>> gives 'totally' different coeffietints and especially s.e. for dz.
>>
>> I think it's quite crucial to understand this methodology and hence I'd
be
>> happy for clarification.
I'd welcome Jack's contribution on this -- it's tricky, and
it's a long time since I thought about this. But here's my
current take on the example you cite (the purpose of which is
to highlight the difference between two specifications which
may look at first glance as if they should be equivalent but
which are in fact different).
First, I'm not sure why we explicitly use the first difference
of z (dz = diff(z)) as a regressor in the example, since
dpanel does differencing automatically (so we'd be using the
second difference of z here, which is not necessarily wrong
but seems like an unnecessary complication). Second, the
standard procedure with the DIF estimator is to use levels as
instruments, and this is what happens when you give the name
of the level variable in a GMM() spec.
So -- although I may be missing something -- I think the
example should read like this:
# first case
dpanel 1 ; y z
# second case
dpanel 1 ; y z ; GMM(z,0,0)
But if we really wanted the second difference of z in the
first spec, then it would read:
dz = diff(z)
dpanel 1 ; y dz
dpanel 1 ; y dz ; GMM(dz,0,0)
where we use the first difference as instrument for the second
difference.
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users