On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 09.10.2011 18:48, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
>>> You probably thought about that yourself, but are there other contexts
>>> where gretl could give gnuplot more than it can handle?
>>
>> Yes, that occurred to me too, but I haven't yet tried to do anything
>> about it.
>
> And I'd be tempted to add: time is on our side. Even if there were any,
> we've been using gnuplot for long enough that I'm confident that they
> ought to be pretty unlikely in real life, and probably easily fixable.
>
I'm not on Windows right now, otherwise I would try to provoke the crash
by simply throwing many many data at gnuplot (from within gretl) to
produce a scatterplot. And if it were possible to replicate the crash, I
would say it should be prevented. But of course you're right, this isn't
terribly important.
Besides, if you had a systematic way to provoke a crash in gnuplot, that
would be a gnuplot bug, not a gretl bug. Of course we could (perhaps
should) do all our best to help them fix it, but division of labour is a
good thing.
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti