Hi Sven,
Agreed.One assumes that when one sees a large Download sign on the page
and a clickable Source file , the natural instinct is to assume that is
what one should download and that they would launch with an installer, or
that an instal exe file would be in the downloaded package of files.
Having the self installing Windows and Linux versions at the top of that
page would seem more logical.
Brian
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, 17:10 Sven Schreiber, <sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de>
wrote:
Am 07.08.2024 um 17:26 schrieb Brian Revell:
Hi Marcin
Thanks. I found the MS Windows autoi-nstall eventually further down the
page after giving up looking in the unpacked gretl-2024b.tar folders for an
exe file/installer.
It is a little misleading when opening up the download gretl page to see
the source file listed first. T
I guess you're talking of the gretl homepage and the Download section. I
agree that even on Linux the source package is probably mostly relevant to
the distro packagers and perhaps doesn't deserve the first slot, and that
the homepage in general could be streamlined and could perhaps use less
text on the front page.
Note, however, that on the left there is a kind of menu that has "gretl
for Windows" as the second entry, which leads you to the installers you
want.
cheers
sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list -- gretl-users(a)gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-users-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-users.gretlml.univpm.it/