Dear Sven,
It was my fault!
I created the logged first differences after restricting the full sample,
thus when I tried to forecast there was no ld_y out-of-sample available!
My bad.
PG
*Periklis Gogas
<
http://www.econ.duth.gr/personel/dep/gkogkas/index.en.shtml>*
Professor
Economic Analysis and International Economics
Department of Economics
Democritus University of Thrace
Euro Area Business Cycle Network - Fellow
<
http://www.eabcn.org/person/periklis-gogas>
The Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis - Fellow
<
http://www.rcfea.org/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/>
The Society for Economic Measurement - Member
<
http://sem.society.cmu.edu/home.html>
Institute for Nonlinear Dynamical Inference (INDI) - Charter Fellow
<
http://icemr.ru/institute-for-nonlinear-dynamical-inference/>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:17 PM Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Am 12.03.2021 um 10:55 schrieb Periklis Gogas:
This happens *sometimes *when using Gretl.
I use the *same data every time* in my class and *sometimes *when I go
here after I have restricted the sample to 1980:4 and try to forecast the
next 4 years, it only lets me forecast 1 period ahead. I cannot set the End
to 1984:4
Well, you didn't mention whether you also use the same model.
Obviously, if gretl's behavior is non-deterministic for exactly the same
circumstances, it would be a bug. Given how computers work, it's also
relatively improbable.
So my wild guess is that sometimes you have an exogenous variable which
makes a multistep dynamic forecast impossible.
cheers
sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list -- gretl-users(a)gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-users-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-users.gretlml.univpm.it/