Am 27.04.19 um 21:22 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
 On Sat, 27 Apr 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 27.04.2019 um 13:03 schrieb Artur Tarassow:
>
>> I still face this issue. Any idea or comment on this?
>
>> Am 24.04.19 um 19:32 schrieb Artur Tarassow:
>
>>>      eval $t2        # T=65
>>>      smpl 1974:2 1974:3
>>>      smpl full
>>>      eval $t2        # T=55
>>> end function
>
>>> Is this is really intended? If yo, why?
>
> Looks like a bug to me. But have you tried anything else than $t2 to
> verify the length?
 Hmm, extending the dataset within a function is a "special 
 concession", which doesn't survive after the function returns. The
 amendment to the C code that permits this is marked "experimental, 
 2015-07-28".
 However, if we're allowing this at all then I guess $t2 should adjust 
 accordingly and "smpl full" should work as one might expect.
 (Though the usual effect of "smpl full" inside a function is to return 
 to whatever sample range was in force at caller level.)
 That's now done it git. 
Thank you, Allin, it works perfectly here now!
Artur