Re: [Gretl-users] GMM BUg Report
Allin,
Thank you for the quick response and efficient process.
I'm so used to application crashing under Windows, I didn't bother with bug
report before and worked around when possible.
Working with a fixed version within 12 hours is so much easier.
With kind regards,
Ofer Cornfeld
-----Original Message-----
From: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu
[mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] On Behalf Of Allin Cottrell
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 10:11 PM
To: Gretl list
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] GMM BUg Report
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Ofer Cornfeld wrote:
I'm working on GRETL CVS under windows XP.
Attached please find a dataset that I'm using and a two similar GRETL
scripts.
gmm93 do not crash GRETL and gmm93-a do crash GRETL. The difference
between
the two is a minor addition in line 87 of gmm93-a.
I hope this can help pinpoint the bug.
Thanks for the report. The bug was due to mis-handling of the
maximum command line length in the context of loops. This is now
fixed in CVS and the Windows snapshot. But I agree with Jack's
advice that the script would be more efficient with the very long
gmm line broken into manageable pieces.
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users