Re: [Gretl-users] Importing weekly data: bug?
Am 04.06.2018 um 18:13 schrieb Matteo Pelagatti:
I guess that 664903 is the internal representation of the date, but I
would have expected something like "2006-01-02".
Yes. Putting that number into the isodate() function yields
1821(-)06(-)11, but I don't know if this means anything. (Why should
that 19th century day be a default pick?)
Is this a bug, or I am missing something?
Very much looks like one.
I guess you are aware that as a workaround you can import the data with
these bogus dates and then afterwards apply the command 'setobs 52
2006-01-02'.
cheers,
sven