[Gretl-users] Re: Resample without replacement (Artur Tarassow)
Am 19.09.2019 um 08:45 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Any other thoughts on this?
I personally don't like very much having both msample() and resample(),
but I can't see an easy way out of this.
I agree about the function proliferation point.
The second argument to resample must currently be >= 2, though. Perhaps
a value of 0 could be interpreted as "don't replace". If this
order-preserving thing is really needed, this then could become a third
choice argument?
cheers
sven