Re: [Gretl-users] List of research using gretl

Am 28.02.2018 um 13:39 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> Am 28.02.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: >>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Artur Tarassow wrote: >> >>>>> I think we need (even) more advertisement for the great 'Gretl' >>>>> project! What do you think about compiling a handy list of research >>>>> articles for which we guys used gretl. >> >>>> Ah, yes, nice idea. Il'll send you mine asap. >>> >>> On the other hand, thinking about this a bit more, I wonder whether this >>> may be counterproductive, sound a bit like an "excusatio non petita" and >>> convey the opposite message. Can you imagine a page like this on the R >>> website? To be honest, I haven't thought about this perspective at all before. I spoke to 3 people this afternoon about this. All of them like the idea very much. R, Matlab and other well-known competitors don't need such advertisement anymore. Gretl, instead, faces some kind of asymmetric information issue: Potential users may not be aware of its capabilities and they want to see some "seal of quality". Showing people some publication record may be such a "seal of quality".