On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Artur Tarassow wrote:
Am 15.04.2017 um 12:27 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Artur Tarassow wrote:
>
>> Dear gretl users,
>>
>> I have a three laptops (some of them are about 5 years old but have
>> fast CPUs implemented) and a desktop computer available, and was
>> thinking to set up a small-scale cluster.
>>
>> It seems to me that the MPI interface which gretl supports is just
>> designed for such a task. Is this correct?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Does anybody have some experience with it?
>
> Some. In order to make the most of it, keep in mind that the most
> stringent constraint on performance is the ethernet connection. So,
> you're going to have good results as far as you manage to split the
> workload between processes in such a way to minimise the amount of data
> they have to trade between one another. Sometimes it's relatively simple
> to do so, sometimes it requires some ingenuity.
>
> HTH,
Thank you for your answer, Jack. I was thinking to setup an experiment
estimating big VARs combining a rolling-window plus bootstrap approach where
at each window (in total about 500) some heavy-load bootstrap is done.
I guess in this case it wouldn't make much sense to distribute the bootstrap
part over all PCs but rather the rolling-window task.
That sounds right. If a bootstrap routine is recursive -- as it
would be with a VAR -- then it doesn't make sense to parcel it out
among processors, but each processor could work on a different set
of windows.
Allin