On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:24 PM, Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
 
Am 04.02.2014 15:08, schrieb Anutechia Asongu:
 But my concern persists: after performing the two-step System GMM, the
 results for the AR(2) errors test reads 'not applicable'. Can I use the
 AR(1) test as the information criterion for the Arellano & Bond
 autocorrelation test? 
I don't really know what you mean by "information criterion for the 
test", but in Arellano-Bond the AR(1) test doesn't tell you anything 
that you didn't know already, first-order correlation is/should be in 
there by design. So, no.
-sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
Thanks Sven,
Well, I'm thinking of trying something else, limiting instrument proliferation by
changing how the instrument is set and not by shrinking the sample (decreasing T and
increasing N) as I did in my previous strategy. Can anyone gist me on the Gretl equivalent
of Stata's
xtabond2? 
http://www.cgdev.org/publication/note-theme-too-many-instruments-working-...
Thank you in advance