If positive, how about 'gretl-methods'? PS ________________________________________ From: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu [gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu] On Behalf Of Allin Cottrell [cottrell(a)wfu.edu] Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 6:29 PM To: Gretl list Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Johansen question On Sun, 1 May 2011, MICHAEL BOLDIN wrote: That's an interesting question. Participants in the gretl-users list are generally tolerant (up to a point) of questions that are not really gretl-specific. But general questions of econometric methodology don't fall within the currently advertised purpose of this list. I wouldn't mind setting up a parallel list for methodological questions (as you say, "connected to gretl") if people think (a) that would be useful, and (b) it's better not to use gretl-users for this purpose. (If there were another list to which we could refer methodological queries we could just do so, but so far as I know there isn't really such a thing.) Thoughts? (And if positive, suggestions for a name for the list?) Allin Cottrell _______________________________________________ Gretl-users mailing list Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users

This would benefit young and relatively less experienced researchers like me. Cheers Talha 2011/5/2 Henrique Andrade <henrique.coelho(a)gmail.com&gt;: -- “An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field.” - Niels Bohr (1885-1962) --