Am 04.01.2018 um 11:13 schrieb Schaff, Frederik:
 
 > Happy New Year!
 
 
 And to you! (and everybody)
 
 
 > guess it is a problem with large integer (part) of the numbers?
Is
 
 > this only the visible behaviour or can it really distort the
data and
 
 > computations? In this case it wouldn’t matter, but in other
cases it
 
 > might…
 
 
 There are two separate issues here, the internal number
representation and
 
 the printed format.
 
 
 AFAIK in gretl basically everything is stored as a double precision
float (should
 
 be 64 bit == 8 byte wide). It is a standard computer science thing
that floating
 
 point numbers cannot exactly represent all integers, and in principle
you also
 
 have the possibility of overflow. In this (very old and universal)
sense yes in
 
 principle it could affect the results. This is not usually a problem
in practice,
 
 however.
 
 
 The limited number of digits/precision which is displayed is
different from
 
 that. There are some 'set' options for that for example,
quoted from the
 
 command ref:
 
 
> <doc
 
 - display_digits: an integer from 3 to 6, specifying the number of
significant
 
 digits to use when displaying regression coefficients and standard
errors (the
 
 default being 6). This setting can also be used to limit the number
of digits
 
 shown by the summary command; in this case the default (and also the
 
 maximum) is 5, or 4 when the --simple option is given.
 
 
 - mwrite_g: on or off (the default). When writing a matrix to file as
text, gretl
 
 by default uses scientific notation with 18-digit precision, hence
ensuring that
 
 the stored values are a faithful representation of the numbers in
memory.
 
 When writing primary data with no more than 6 digits of precision it
may be
 
 preferable to use %g format for a more compact and human-readable
file;
 
 you can make this switch via set mwrite_g on.
 
> </doc
 
 
 In the "show values" (zeige Werte) window there is also a
button number
 
 format (Zahlenformat) where a different display can be chosen.
 
 
 hth,
 
 sven
 
That trick did it, thanks!. For the record, selecting “reformat” (
[cid:image001.png@01D38554.89894C60]  ) and then show (e.g.) the 15  significant figures
worked fine
Frederik