I agree that se's are large but can we have an option to agree with results of other
softwares? stata, r, spss are all producing similar results.
SPSS resutls wth VIF "in quotations" which are < 5:
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity
Statistics
B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant) 1158559.201 360592.720 3.213 .002
Q 2026114.340 61806.945 .907 32.781 .000 .819 "1.221"
PF 1.225 .104 .339 11.814 .000 .763 "1.311"
LF -3065753.131 696327.318 -.136 -4.403 .000 .659 "1.517"
a Dependent Variable: C
Stata report:
regress c q pf lf
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 90
-------------+---------------------------------- F(3, 86) = 503.12
Model | 1.1966e+14 3 3.9885e+13 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 6.8177e+12 86 7.9276e+10 R-squared = 0.9461
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9442
Total | 1.2647e+14 89 1.4210e+12 Root MSE = 2.8e+05
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c | Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
q | 2026114 61806.94 32.78 0.000 1903246 2148982
pf | 1.225348 .1037217 11.81 0.000 1.019156 1.43154
lf | -3065753 696327.3 -4.40 0.000 -4450006 -1681500
_cons | 1158559 360592.7 3.21 0.002 441724.7 1875394
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R report:
Model Coefficients - C
Predictor Estimate SE t p
Intercept 1.16E+06 360592.72 3.21 0.002
Q 2.03E+06 61806.945 32.78 <.001
PF 1.23 0.104 11.81 <.001
LF -3.07E+06 696327.318 -4.4 <.001