On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
 On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote:
 > As for the possibility of folding the without-replacement variant into
 > resample(), is the idea that without-replacement would also support
 > the blocksize option? (It would be easier if it didn't!)
 Unfortunately, it may do (I think: but it'd be nice if Stefano Fachin, our
 bootstrap guru, would give his opinion on the matter). 
OK, we'll wait for that. In the meantime there's a revised msample()
in git, without the order-preserving option and without a blocksize
option -- for testing if anyone wants to try it.
Allin