On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> As for the possibility of folding the without-replacement variant into
> resample(), is the idea that without-replacement would also support
> the blocksize option? (It would be easier if it didn't!)
Unfortunately, it may do (I think: but it'd be nice if Stefano Fachin, our
bootstrap guru, would give his opinion on the matter).
OK, we'll wait for that. In the meantime there's a revised msample()
in git, without the order-preserving option and without a blocksize
option -- for testing if anyone wants to try it.
Allin