Thanks for the explanation!
Am 27.01.2013 14:54, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 27.01.2013 12:43, schrieb Pindar:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is a strange behavior when combining the 'sd' function with
>> matrices:
>> 1) I thought it flags an error - is it now allowed for matrices?
>> 2) the result is not correct, but the 'var' function works with this
>> simple matrix in the example
>>
>> <hansl>
>> matrix test = {-0.08142857;0.05560000}
>> eval mcov(test)
>> eval var(test)
>> eval sqrt(mcov(test))
>> eval sqrt((test[1]-mean(test))^2 + (test[2]-mean(test))^2)
>> eval sd(test)
>> <hansl>
>>
>>
>
> Without having verified numerically, I suspect this is an issue of 1/n
> versus 1/(n-1). If so, then "correct" is not unique in this case; as you
> know, the first is ML, the second is unbiased. In this extreme case of
> n=2 this will lead to very different results (factor of 1/sqrt(2) I
> guess).
It is. If you eval sd(test)*sqrt(2), you get what you were looking for.
-------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)
Università Politecnica delle Marche
(formerly known as Università di Ancona)
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users