[Gretl-users] Re: “using observations” in the estimation output
Sven
here's another thought for the GUI structural time series modelling
options. Currently the Basic Structural Model only has a seasonal cyclical
element. Were this to be flexible and allow a user defined
periodicity/frequency for annual series, then longer term cycles could be
incorporated into the BSM. Admittedly, a trig cycle can be added into the
exogenous variable group, but it will be deterministic, whereas a
stochastic cycle would be useful (as most of those I have looked at are not
completely regular).
Brian
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 11:05, Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Am 29.12.2020 um 09:29 schrieb Artur Bala:
> Hi all,
>
> Ok, this is not such a great topic but I'm going to submit it anyway...
>
> In an estimation output, gretl uses the expression "using
> observations...", for example:
...
> and here "using observations..." loses its meaning given that the actual
> observations used in the estimation are not in a row anymore.
>
I think it's a valid point. If the obs are non-continguous, I guess the
hyphen should be dropped (giving the false impression of a range) and
simply the number of obs given. I'm less sure whether more information
on the precise subsampling should be given in the header, it might
become too large.
cheers
sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list -- gretl-users(a)gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-users-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-users.gretlml.univpm.it/
Attachments:
- attachment.htm (text/html — 2.5 KB)