Re: [Gretl-users] using lags

removing some of the parameters to be estimated 'fixes' the problem, oddly enough. what we did is remove two of the parameters and the script run well. we then put them back and removed two others, and the script ran as well. that makes me wonder what is going on - if the problem was related to a specific series then this should not have happened. any idea? "I often see problems in the world and wonder why someone doesn't fix them. Then I realize that I am someone, and that makes me feel bad because it is all my fault." http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/fixing_the_world/ ________________________________ From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net&gt; To: Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu&gt; Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 11:25:31 AM Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] using lags Raz Lev schrieb: I think you're right, so you would have to reduce the sample accordingly. To verify that the assumption is correct, I suggest to do this by hand. Later you could add something like smpl --no-missing inputvar(-3) or maybe smpl +3 0 #(according to the help, this may not work, but I think it would be nice if it did) (and revert back to the old sample with 'smpl full') See the built-in command help for smpl. please report back if and what worked cheers, sven _______________________________________________ Gretl-users mailing list Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users