Re: [Gretl-devel] another ternary woe

On Tue, 2 May 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote:

> Just a quick follow-up: I stumbled over a similar issue again (in my > johansensmall.gfn package), and given your response the workaround is > clear. But I noticed that the error message (with 2017a) is that (the > equivalent of) the symbol "garbl" is undefined, whereas above/before I > had reported the error to be "[ invalid". Don't know if that has a > deeper meaning or if it's expected for you. Well, I thought that was an improvement in the error message. But maybe it isn't. I suppose a really explicit message would have to be something like Can't make sense of "garbl[..." since the symbol "garbl" is undefined.