My two cents goto C also.
Cheers
Talha
P.S.: I compiled the latest cvs but it still shows the old output.
Will the new one go into effect later?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Apart from the looks, I'm not sure why Akaike should be
> preferred over Hannan-Quinn in terms of econometrics. I'm sure
> AIC is good for some objectives, but AFAIK it is not consistent
> in the sense that it doesn't pick the true model even
> asymptotically, in contrast to Hannan-Quinn.
>
> Am I mixing things up here, or are these thoughts irrelevnant
> for the issue we're discussing right now? Otherwise I would tend
> to either keep all or ditch AIC.
I agree, the AIC is not all that great. But it's the best known
of the information criteria and if we dropped it I guess we would
have people saying, why don't you print the AIC?
Here's another go at this topic. I've put up
http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/dougherty/table.html
showing a few variants for folks to consider.
* Version A is what I posted yesterday. It is closely (too
closely?) based on eviews and does not have a space for the HQC;
also it prints the Durbin-Watson statistic regardless of whether
or not the data are time series (but does not print rho). We
probably don't want this.
* Version B is what Jack suggested yesterday (although it doesn't
fully correspond with his preferences since it omits the HQC). It
prints rho and DW only for time series.
* Version C is what I'm inclined to favour at present.
* Version D is what Jack canvassed in a later patch.
I'll make a case for C, though I'm not totally committed to this.
First, I don't think it's necessary to print the sample size in
this table, since we always show that in the header for model
output. Second, it's obviously a matter of opinion whether it's
"more logical" to have closely related items (e.g. the F-stat and
its p-value) on the same row (as in Jack's B) or next to each
other vertically (as in C). I find that my eye tends to group
things vertically given this sort of presentation, so I have a
slight preference for C in this regard.
Thoughts?
Allin.
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel
--
"Remember not only to say the right thing in the right place, but far
more difficult still, to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting
moment." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
--