Ang. Re: [Gretl-devel] Bug in help file
Why not just change the name of the gamma function from "gamma" to
"gammafunction" or "gammaf" or something like that?
Andreas
svetosch(a)gmx.net @ INTERNET skrev 2007-09-13 11:14:33 :
Allin Cottrell schrieb:
> > IMO it's not very likely that we'd want to treat gretl functions
> as variables, but any other thoughts?
> Without having read the thread thoroughly, I can see no real advantage
of allowing such name clashes. One can always use "gammavector" or
"mygamma" or whatever. The disadvantage I see is potentially confusing
and hard-to-debug script code, and possible new bugs at the gretl
interpreter level.
-sven