On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
>> Am 03.02.2018 um 03:33 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>>> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net wrote:
>>
>>>> Is there a less roundabout way to extract row names
>>>> of a matrix
>>>
>>> OK, alright! By popular demand, there's now a rowname() function in git.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I've just reviewed the situation with colnames/colname/rownames, however,
>> and I must say I find it not really obvious that colname --and now also
>> rowname-- *gets* the names, while colnames/rownames *puts* names. The
>> labeling seems confusing to me.
>>
>> Could we perhaps rename the new rowname to something like rnameget (or
>> similar), and perhaps introduce a similar alias like cnameget for colname?
>>
>> And a further possible extension: Similar to strsplit(), the functions
>> colname and rowname (or their new aliases) might also return an array of
>> strings of *all* names in the case that the second index argument is
>> omitted.
>
> Might as well strike while the iron is hot: that's now in git.
Why not go all the way, then? How about {c|r}name{get|set}?
OK, good idea, nice and logical. That's now in git.
Allin