Am 13.06.21 um 13:27 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, Artur T. wrote:
>
>> If we agree that this shall become part of the extra package, I add
>> 2-3 tests to our test suit for extra.
>
> Nice work, Artur. I vote for "combinations()". Anyway, let's not
> forget to add in the documentation that the recursive algorithm I used
> is not the fastest when arguments are large.
At present the longest built-in function names are 10 characters and I'd
kind of prefer to keep it that way -- any chance of an abbreviation?
But this is not a built-in function but is supposed to become part of
the extra package for which a couple of function names already exceed 10
characters. Or do you plan to write a built-in equivalent?
Artur