[Gretl-devel] Re: short seq() form

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> and sorry, here's another syntactic-sugar feature request. Couldn't >> seq(n) be made an equivalent short form for seq(1,n)? >> I know, only two keystrokes, but nice to read IMHO and in this context a >> 25% keystroke savings, hehe. > > In my opinion, not so nice to read. Just today, when trying to > understand some R code, I had to look up seq() to confirm what seq(n) > is supposed to mean. OK, I could guess, but seq(1,n) is transparent. me too