Re: [Gretl-devel] Two GUI entry points for a package

What I had in mind was more like "come inside, I'll show you a few things that I normally don't share with others; be my guest and help yourself".

OMG, now that I see it written I realise this can be a little sinister.

Am 17.01.2019 um 16:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> Am 17.01.2019 um 08:57 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: >>> A question (no time to check myself, sorry). If A has B as a sibling >>> and B has C, is C a sibling to A? > > I haven't had time to make the change yet, but it now seems to me that > "sibling" is the wrong word, since siblinghood is inherently mutual > (also transitive) and I don't have that in mind here. I'm now thinking > of "host" (or perhaps "server"). If package A specifies B as "host" > (let's say) that gives A access to B's private functions, but not vice > versa. What about "parent" or the reverse of heir (donor? bequeather?)? > I haven't even thought about multiple layers of hosting, but as things > stand the answer to the question above is No. Yes, no need, methinks. -s _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel