On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:45 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Am 30.07.2024 um 14:14 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Sven Schreiber
> <sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Am 28.07.2024 um 14:33 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
>>> Am 28.07.2024 um 02:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>>>> Ah, your ui-maker specifications for list arguments are out-of-date.
>>>> The possibilities are: list_no_singleton, list_no_const and
>>>> list_exclude. IIRC it was you who requested the "list_" prefix
for
>>>> these conditions ;-). See the current function-package doc.
>>> ...
>>> So that means we have to adjust the (few) packages that use the old
>>> style? For example, StrucTiSM does, and maybe some others, too.
>> Is this no_singleton vs. list_no_singleton thing visible in the XML code
>> in the gfn file?
> Yes, you just have to look at the ui-maker function.
OK, I checked all the function packages, and apart from the mentioned
StrucTiSM the constructs without list_ are used in ParMA and in
random_forest.
However: I also read the package doc more thoroughly, and it says there:
"These keywords can also be given in a shorter form, omitting the list_
prefix, ". That would then bring me back to the original question why it
didn't seem to work in the example I gave? (I haven't tested yet whether
it would work with the list_ prefix.)
Good point, and good question. I'll take another look at this.
Allin