Am 15.04.2017 um 16:07 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
However... when I first tried this I thought I had replicated the
problem you describe: kept on getting the "the error" even after
correcting and saving the function script! Then I realized that there
was an error in the caller that happened to "mimic" the deliberate one
in the function script, in that the undefined symbol had the same name
in each case. I wonder if that is what's happening in your case. That
would explain the absence of any call-stack information in the error
message.
That would explain it, but again: why would it then have worked without
changing anything after a gretl restart?
The whole thing is no big deal. But would you confirm that in theory
gretl reads in file.inp every time that "include file.inp" is found? Or
is there some case like with gfn files where this isn't done (on purpose)?
thanks,
sven