Hi,
I mostly agree with Jack, only that one month strikes me as too long for
a point release. So I'd vote for two or three weeks.
-sven
Am 04.09.2011 11:11, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> I think that we getting overdue for a 1.9.6 release (the change log
> is bulging).
>
> If people agree, I'll send out a note to the translators and also a
> note to the users list (as suggested by Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza at
> this year's gretl conference) announcing a "bug-fix week" before
> release.
>
> But does anyone have a reason to prefer holding back on a release?
> If so, please say.
I'm totally for a new release. Only, I'd have a freeze period longer
than a week. Ideally, once the freeze is announced, people should:
1) grab the CVS version, either as a snapshot executable or by building
it themselves.
2) run through their existing set of scripts and/or commonly executed tasks
3) compare the results with some known benchmark
4) in case of differences, double-check it's not them doing something
different
5) write a bug report and send it.
This takes time (plus, it also takes time to get bugs fixed); a week is
too short IMO. I'd make it a month, but I'm open to change my mind.
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel