Am 07.04.2008 04:09, Allin Cottrell schrieb:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Allin Cottrell schrieb:
>> In CVS, we now have a guard against unmatched "if" for loops,
>> user-defined functions, and entire scripts. Please report if
>> anything seems to be wrong with this.
>>
>> We also try to ensure that the "if stack" gets destroyed on error.
> If it's doable for "if" blocks, why not do it for all types of
> blocks, like loop - end loop, function - end function, gmm - end
> gmm, mle - end mle, and so on?
Aren't they already handled? Please file a bug report if they're
not.
Ah, so I misunderstood what the bug was about. Sorry for the noise.
-sven