On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 AM Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
<r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>> Actually, we could go for a name that emphasises the _purpose_ of the
>> function. How about multieq_draw(); then of course we need to explain
>> thoroughly what it does and how in the docs, but IMO the name is nice
>> and easy to remember.
>
> Hehe, I think I "incepted" you, see three replies earlier. I don't
like
> the underscore too much though (but it's not a full veto). syseqdraw?
> multieqdraw?
MultiEqDraw()?
I prefer underscores to camel case, but maybe I should shut up since
I'm not actively involved in this!
Allin