Re: [Gretl-devel] status

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> Ah yes, the Kalman filter would be most welcome and some sort of >> killer feature actually! I would even go so far as to say that this >> should have priority among the econometric features, because it is so >> fundamental and versatile. Most of the other requested functionality >> could be implemented via user functions and such, but the Kalman >> filter should be native. And after that even more stuff can be done >> in user functions... >> > > Forgot to add the following, therefore replying to self... I don't > think this type of fundamental feature should be stopping a release > though. The feature is ready when it is ready, and IMHO there's no > point in holding one's breath for it. Ok. If I don't fall asleep tonight, I'll post an RFC to the list. Ps: It's strange the link doesn't work for you. I just checked it and it seems to be there alright. Anyone with the same problem? Sven, if the problem persists, I'll send you the tarball privately.