Am 11.07.2021 um 19:15 schrieb Artur T.:
Am 09.07.21 um 19:01 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> - ...or biting the backwards-incompatibility bullet and change
the
> original fft() to do what fft2() does now. (My quick check doesn't show
> any package that uses fft anymore, so no breakage expected there.)
"fft" might be a reasonable name as this abbreviation is well-known I
would say.
Well, no doubt it's reasonable, as it has been the name for years. But
what do you think about the backward incompatibility?
thanks
sven