Am 10.07.2009 16:32, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti schrieb:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> One small thing: "rev" strikes me as kinda cryptic. If it's
> standard usage elsewhere then maybe it's OK, but otherwise I'd
> prefer something a bit more explicit, say "mreverse".
I agree; "mreverse" is fine by me.
rev() is from R, no? But mreverse() is more intuitive, I agree. And
maybe it's not that bad to have different names in R and gretl for what
may be similar but probably isn't strictly equivalent.
thanks,
sven