Re: [Gretl-devel] default values for matrices?
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net wrote:
Dear Allin, Of course, I may be wrong, but I think like that: 1)
*matrices are certainly better for big matrices, e.g. quantiles
for surface responses 2) for small matrices, it's a matter of
convenience for an user: with *matrices we can't input
fun({1,2,3},...)
only
b = {1,2,3}
fun(&b,....)
OK, I take your point. I suppose we could enable a default of "null"
for non-pointer matrix arguments, though I think it might be more in
keeping with our type system to enable "{}" instead.
Allin