Re: [Gretl-devel] args in lags() vs. mlag()
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 17.02.2017 um 13:03 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> I find it confusing in routine work that the lags() function wants to
> have the lag number as the first arg, while the mlag() function wants to
> have the input matrix first and afterwards the lag number.
ping, stumbled over this again... but maybe it's just me.
I agree. If we had this to do over we'd try harder to do it
consistently. But isn't it now too late?
Allin