> have named arguments.
>
> foo(&mybundle, X, 1, 5, 0, 1) versus
>
> foo(&mybundle, X, TRUE, 5, FALSE, 1)
Oh yes, this is nice to read! I like it.
What about function statements of this type:
<hansl>
function void foo (const bool B[FALSE])
print B
end function
foo()
</hansl>
Does it make sense to allow such arguments for booleans? Currently that
fails.
OK, that's now in git.
Thanks!
Artur