Re: [Gretl-devel] questions on Durbin-Watson stuff
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
IMHO ... we should keep our namespace as clean as possible, so
genr functions should only be provided when both the following
conditions are met:
1) the C implementation is substantially more efficient than a
user-written function
2) its purpose is reasonably general.
Yes, I agree. I think this argues for scrapping dwmat() and
dwpval() but possibly keeping imhof(). I'll do that unless I hear
any protests.
Allin.