On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Actually, we could go for a name that emphasises the _purpose_ of
the
> function. How about multieq_draw(); then of course we need to explain
> thoroughly what it does and how in the docs, but IMO the name is nice
> and easy to remember.
Hehe, I think I "incepted" you, see three replies earlier. I don't like
the underscore too much though (but it's not a full veto). syseqdraw?
multieqdraw?
MultiEqDraw()?
-------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)
Università Politecnica delle Marche
(formerly known as Università di Ancona)
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------